It is currently Thu Jan 22, 2026 12:16 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: GuruTerm with Xfer's
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 12:37 am
Posts: 47
I just loaded up Guruterm from the MMC64 to call around for a while. I started to think how nice it would be if it had a transfer system built in that could save to the MMC64. Maybe in another 10-15 years this could be possible :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:44 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 11:22 am
Posts: 874
Hihi.. I admit I'm a turtle. But, yes! I definitly have plans for filetransfer in GuruTerm!! :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 43
RaveGuru wrote:
Hihi.. I admit I'm a turtle. But, yes! I definitly have plans for filetransfer in GuruTerm!! :D


We await with much anticipation! :D

As an aside, I was thinking about how to add a network stack to Craig Bruce's ACE. Getting it into the kernel would be pretty difficult, but it may be feasible to graft the first-class VT100 code onto the guts of GuruTerm. ACE is pretty modular and everything communicates over a simple API.

What are your thoughts Rave, are you keeping the guts separate from the screen code?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 10:22 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 11:22 am
Posts: 874
Well.. currently the screen code in GuruTerm consists of one line of assembler code:

JSR $FFD2

So I guess that's a Yes :D

Well that's not all true. I'm taking care of Cursor drawing aswell. But Terminal emulation could be implemented fairly easily I believe.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 12:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 43
Cool, the VT100 code in ACE is magic, just needs to be converted to a different assembler. Then converted away from the ACE kernel. That probably wouldn't be too bad, but I think the 80 column rendering is done in the kernel, so that would be a trickier job.

Still, 40 column VT is better than no VT100. :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:33 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 11:22 am
Posts: 874
I'm sure there is plenty of open source VT100 code out there, just laying around, waiting to be used though. Would save the hassle of ripping and backporting the ACE code at least. :idea:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group